Focus On The Wielder, Not the Wielded
Jun. 21st, 2014 07:48 pmEvery time a shooter pulls a gun nowadays and uses it with lethal force, donations to political organizations dedicated to restricting firearms in some way skyrocket. No one can blame the donors; they see an out-of-control situation and seek a means to staunch the bloodshed.
Here's the kicker, though: after each of these incidents, donations to the NRA and other pro-Second Amendment organizations also spikes. The reason is fairly simple. If the gun restriction crowd gets its way, the lifestyle of the gun rights crowd might well go away, no matter what positive benefit to society the restriction on guns might have. Which leads to the real split, as author Dan Baum puts it:
My point here is not to debate the rise or fall in gun-related violence, though, but to note that any rise in violence should be noted with equal focus. ( Which leads me to last Monday. )
X-Posted to
talk_politics.
Here's the kicker, though: after each of these incidents, donations to the NRA and other pro-Second Amendment organizations also spikes. The reason is fairly simple. If the gun restriction crowd gets its way, the lifestyle of the gun rights crowd might well go away, no matter what positive benefit to society the restriction on guns might have. Which leads to the real split, as author Dan Baum puts it:
Data bout the effects of gun-control measures could be compared and contrasted. When it came to whether restrictive gun laws did good or did harm, reasonable people could disagree.
Finding reasonable people was the problem.
(Dan Baum, Gun Guys, Borzoi Books, 2013, p. 205.)
My point here is not to debate the rise or fall in gun-related violence, though, but to note that any rise in violence should be noted with equal focus. ( Which leads me to last Monday. )
X-Posted to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)