peristaltor: (Default)
Found a follow-up to something interesting I heard last year about how people cannot be told the truth if the truth disagrees with their preconceptions.

The same sort of issue — the persistence of misperceptions in the face of evidence — has also been intriguing Brendan Nyhan, of Duke University, North Carolina, and Jason Reifler, of Georgia State University. And they have published two fascinating papers providing the results of experiments that they conducted into whether it is possible to correct such errors of fact.

Their conclusions are not a cause for optimism.


I had heard about their study when I was writing my Deist Miasma series, but they were still working on questions I found too fundamental to include before the answers had been found. This new study found what I had suspected all along:

First, correcting a misperception doesn’t really work when the original misperception fits snugly with the subject’s ideology. Second, and worse still, attempting to correct errors often produces a backlash, with the error becoming more firmly believed. (Emphasis mine.)


Lesson: It really doesn't matter that you are right on the facts; people who don't like the facts simply won't listen.
peristaltor: (Default)
Forgive me, readers, for I have omitted. When I first started The Deist Miasma, I fully expected to answer that last question asked in Part I, Why do many creationists feel so threatened by the scientific explanations for life's diversity? After all, the "Fundamentally" in the post's title refers to the fundamental, underpinning assumptions Behe, Schlafly and Walker all hold that forces their science attacking actions. I wrapped up the third and last installment, though, and forgot to answer that question. Why? I am a forgetful idiot. That's why.

I've added the following to the original Part I. If you'd like to read the entire thing, be my guest. If you remember the original, continue after the cut to the original entry. Onward. )
peristaltor: (Default)


Not familiar with the James Randi Educational Foundation? James has worked tirelessly over the decades to debunk the bunko artists, the crap salespeople that peddle cheap gimmicks as gold, that prey upon the desperate with empty hopes. He does this by demonstrating what cheats these people are, and by offering a simple challenge: If you think you are psychic in any way, come to us and let us prove it. If you can demonstrate your psychic or paranormal powers in a double-blind test, The Randi Foundation give you a million dollars. It's that simple.

So far, no one has accepted the challenge and collected the money. Go figure.

The problem might be, though, that these flim-flam artists don't really need Randi's cash. They make pretty good money peddling lies and deceit to their generally pretty strong followings. If they tell their legion of minions to complain about Randi, they probably will.


Via Pharyngula.

Addendum, April 12, 2009: It looks like Randi is back on the air! Woo-hoo!
peristaltor: (Default)
After writing the three parts to this (for me of little stamina) exhausting series, I decided to give it a compendium page.

Part I -- Evidence of Something Fundamentally Different
Part II -- The Tendency to Blame the Stink
Part III -- The Tenacity of Purpose


Also, making this seemingly insignificant entry gives me the opportunity to add something I would have added earlier, had I heard it early enough. I didn't. It's a talk given by the Reverend Thomas Goodhue, author of Curious Bones: Mary Anning and the Birth of Paleontology, part of a three part Darwin Day celebration podcast from Scientific American's Science Talk with Steve Mirsky.* Let me give you a taste:

More than 12,000 clergy . . . have signed a joint declaration that says, "The timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist." An yet, for many Americans (about half of the population according to the Gallup Polls) . . . are still opposed to the theory of evolution and oppose it being taught in the public schools. That's always been a mystery to me, since it's, my whole life, practically, been clear to me it is without doubt the most important scientific theory ever presented. . . . It's almost impossible to understand the biological sciences -- or, as we've just heard, half of the other sciences these days -- without understanding the theory of evolution. Yet people are still agin' it.

. . . I think there are many reasons for this. One has to do -- and without a doubt, this is the most important reason . . . -- shortly after Darwin presented his theory, it was bastardized into something called "Social Darwinism" that had nothing to do with Darwin's scientific theory. (It) was, if anything, more of a theological or religious belief, (stating) that if you survived you were the fittest. It led to a whole series of incredibly racist theories being developed. The whole eugenics . . . movement in America that said people should be sterilized if they were poor to keep them from reproducing. Jim Crow laws across the land were supported by social Darwinism.

. . . . People sometimes talk today as if the battle was between Darwin and the fundamentalists. It really wasn't for generations. The battle was between progress Christians and the Social Darwinists. As is so often the case, movements move away from their founders and people forget that, in this case, Charles Darwin would have been horrified by things that people were saying in the name of Social Darwinism. (His) theory was inspired more by an opposition to slavery, perhaps, than anything else.

But I think, too, there's opposition to the teaching of evolution still today because far too many secular people, far too many agnostics and atheists, assume that most Christians are going to oppose them on the teaching of evolution. For Catholicism and most main-line Protestants, this really isn't a big issue. (Far) too many people who believe in the theory of evolution dismiss the possibility that people of faith could believe in theistic evolution and still be good scientists.


There's much more, and it's good stuff. Enjoy.


*By the way, of all the science-y podcasts out there, Steve does the best job of making the science interesting and entertaining without sucking the meat-and-potatoes detail out of the synopsis. Only the folks at The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe do it better; but, in all fairness, they're format is a tad different.
peristaltor: (Default)
I started writing the Deist Miasma series with high hopes, but little else. I was missing something, a crucial piece of evidence (as opposed to suspicion) that may have finally surfaced. It's a preliminary study that requires some expansion, but it reinforced the niggling thoughts that started this series enough to motivate me to finish it. Onward, interested parties! )
peristaltor: (Default)
Ever wonder why New Year's Day always falls a week after Xmas Day? Blame Dennis the Short:

Dennis began his career working in Constantinople for Pope Gelasius, translating works in the papal archives from Greek into Latin. Later, under Pope John I, he was still translating - this time working on Easter tables drawn up by Saint Theophilus. The problem was that under the dating system of the time, Easter was difficult to calculate because the calendars weren't correct. Dennis decided to correct the dating system which was then using Anno Diocletani - years since the Roman emperor Diocletian. Diocletian was infamous for persecuting Christians. Dennis wanted to glorify Christ, so he worked on a dating system based on the life of Jesus. . . .

The actual date of Jesus' birth had long been lost or forgotten by the time he started his quest, so Dennis, in his efforts to simplify the convoluted 19-year and 84-year Easter cycles, turned to the only sources he could find - Roman ones. He used them to try and backtrack. Good idea, but his sources were not accurate. Nor was his grasp of mathematics.


How bad were Dennis' sources and math? Herod, the king before which Jesus was presented the king who ordered the census that caused Mary and Joseph to trek to Bethlehem, died in 4 BC. Ah, but I digress. Back to New Year's Day:

Dennis also decided the eighth day after Jesus' birth (traditionally the date of his circumcision, based on Jewish custom) should be the official New Year - the start of year 1 - as his marker. (Emphasis mine.)


It turns out Jesus wouldn't have been named before this ceremony, and for good reason:

The kabbalistic writings teach us that seven days represent the physical world of creation. Thus, when a child has lived for eight days, he has transcended the physical to the metaphysical. The covenant joining body and soul, physical and spiritual, can now take place. A bris has no meaning when performed before the eighth day.


Who knew?

Happy (snip) New Year!


X-Posted to [livejournal.com profile] antitheism.


Addendum, later that day: My biblical ignorance corrected by [livejournal.com profile] vox_diabolica.
peristaltor: (Default)


Abandon ye all sense of irony and Join the Paliban!

*head-desk head-desk head-desk head-desk head-desk*
peristaltor: (Default)
Here's a fun repost from three years ago. It came in an email circulated probably not too widely. Enjoy!




Hola a todos!

As some of you may already know Catalonia has some rather unique Christmas traditions - here is a little background, which I thought might interest you, on two of the most peculiar...

The Caganer - a wholesome and fun Catalan addition to the typical Christmas creche figurine family of baby Jesus, Mary, Joseph, the three kings and shepherds etc. The traditional Caganer is an old Catalan man with a red hat or "barretina" and canvas shoes squatting and "taking a dump" in the manger. This traditional figure is generally viewed as the "immemorial fecundator, whom nature calls even as the Messiah is born. Robert Hughes writes:

"Nothing can distract him from the archetypal task of giving back to the soil the nourishment that supplied it to him".

If you look closely at Joan Miró´s 1921-22 painting "La Granja, Montroig" you will see a child squatting a la Caganer.

Over time, the theme has expanded to include sumo wrestlers, Santa, the Devil, the Pope, Dalí, and recently Barcelona football players such as Eto and Ronaldinho, just to name a few.

There's a good site describing them, and selling about 60 different varieties.

The second tradition unique to Catalonia is that of the Caga tio.

The Caga tio is a cross between a Christmas log and a Mexican Piñata and comes in many sizes painted with a smiley face and typically standing up on two or four little stick legs. Customs surrounding Caga tio differ, but all agree, Caga tio means "shit log." Here is more or less the Caga tio ritual.

Fifteen days before Christmas, Caga tio makes his appearance in the dining room, where he must be fed at least once every day. He likes oranges, crackers and sweet wine. In some families, Caga tio starts small, but grows as the days progress toward Christmas.

At some point, Caga tio is moved out of the dining room, into the living room, and covered with a blanket to keep him warm. On Christmas Eve, before the traditional Christmas dinner, the kids are sent to their rooms to say three Our Fathers, which gives the elders enough time to stash presents under Caga tio's blanket. After their prayers are done, the kids return to the living room and start beating the poor Caga tio with big sticks. And they sing a song. One version goes "Shit, log, shit! If you don't shit well, we will whack you !" Another goes "Log, log, shit candy! If you don't shit for Christmas, we will whack you once more!"



Shitty Shitting Xmas gifts abound online!


The Catalian version:


"Caga tió,
sinó et donaré un cop de bastó!

Tió de Nadal,
caga torrons
i pixa vi blanc!

Tió de Nadal
caga neules i torrons
i pixa xampany!"


The Spanish version:

"Caga tio
sino te daré un golpe de bastón!

Tío de navidad,
caga turrones,
y mea vino blanco!

Tío de navidad
caga nueces y turrones
y mea champagne!"


(It's me, Peristaltor. After I posted this, I had my sister translate the Spanish, and an anonymous poster provided me with a better translation:)

Shit, log
If you won't I'll beat you with a stick!

Christmas log,
shit torrons (a traditional Spanish Christmas candy)
and piss white wine.

Christmas log,
shit neules (a traditional Christmas wafer) and torrons
and piss champagne (Catalan sparkling wine cava is often referred to as champange in colloquial use).


(Back to the post! -P.)

After the children have gotten their fill of flogging the log, the blanket is removed to determine Caga tio's state of digestion. Typically, a miracle has occurred, and the log has pooped wrapped gifts, which are called "the shits." Often one of the shits will be something weird, like an egg, to let everyone know that it was the last one deposited by Caga tio. . . .

Have fun!


Huh, huh -- "flogging the log." That's "the shits." Huh, huh.

Enjoy yer ritualistic vacations!

Addendum, The Day After Xmas:



From Hitler to Obama to Papa Smurf to Bart Simpson:
A caganer diorama that proves "Everybody Poops."
peristaltor: (Default)
PZ at Pharyngula notes a great article about who really started the "War" on Christmas. . . and why.

Max Blumenthal traces the counter-assault to some knuckle-dragger named Peter Brimelow. Brimelow notes the "true" scrooges here:

Unlike their more respectable counterparts, Brimelow’s writers dared to name the true anti-Christian Grinch: Jews. The winner of Brimelow’s 2001 War on Christmas competition, a “paleoconservative” writer named Tom Piatak, insisted that those behind the assault on Christmas “evidently prefer” Hanukkah, which he called the “Jewish Kwanzaa,” a “faux-Christmas.” “Teaching children about Hanukkah, rather than the beliefs that actually sustained Jews on their sometimes tragic and tumultuous historical journey,” Piatak fumed, “inculcates negative lessons about Christianity, not positive ones about Judaism.”


To that last sentence I must ask; Really? Celebrating an oil lamp that burned longer than anyone expected somehow points a finger of blame at an upstart cult that follows a dead carpenter? Really?!?

Wow. It's refreshing to note true anti-Semitism for a change.

Update, December 15: PZ at Pharyngula notes that the US House of Representitives has gotten into the act, sponsoring House Resolution 847. Let's read:

H. Res. 847
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
December 11, 2007.
Whereas Christmas, a holiday of great significance to Americans and many other cultures and nationalities, is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and the world;
Whereas there are approximately 225,000,000 Christians in the United States, making Christianity the religion of over three-fourths of the American population;
Whereas there are approximately 2,000,000,000 Christians throughout the world, making Christianity the largest religion in the world and the religion of about one-third of the world population;
Whereas Christians and Christianity have contributed greatly to the development of western civilization;
Whereas the United States, being founded as a constitutional republic in the traditions of western civilization, finds much in its history that points observers back to its Judeo-Christian roots;
Whereas on December 25 of each calendar year, American Christians observe Christmas, the holiday celebrating the birth of their savior, Jesus Christ;
Whereas for Christians, Christmas is celebrated as a recognition of God's redemption, mercy, and Grace; and
Whereas many Christians and non-Christians throughout the United States and the rest of the world, celebrate Christmas as a time to serve others: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) recognizes the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world;
(2) expresses continued support for Christians in the United States and worldwide;
(3) acknowledges the international religious and historical importance of Christmas and the Christian faith;
(4) acknowledges and supports the role played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States and in the formation of the western civilization;
(5) rejects bigotry and persecution directed against Christians, both in the United States and worldwide; and
(6) expresses its deepest respect to American Christians and Christians throughout the world.

(Yup, Emphasis mine once again.)


Most of the Republicans (and 2 Democrats) of the US House of Representatives: Appeasing the fear mongers Keeping the country safe from non-Christians with non-binding resolutions that do absolutely, positively nothing. Follow the Pharyngula link to see exactly who sponsored this banal hysteria!

Another addendum, Xmas Eve: Just to take the seriousness out of the whole issue:

peristaltor: (Default)
. . . Is the reason for the season!



Ritual torture and slaughter -- it's a family event.


Finally, someone comes up with an able response to Faux News' Attack on Christmas. Leave it to The Onion!
peristaltor: (Default)
Last month, I rambled a bit on Part I of the Deist Miasma to introduce the deliberately manipulative obfuscation those of a certain religious bent spin on scientific discoveries they feel threaten the basic tenets of the faiths they espouse . . . and that keeps them in positions of relative power. I did this, however, without even mentioning why I called it "The Deist Miasma." I'll correct that oversight with this post. )
peristaltor: (Default)
Very recently, researchers led by Richard Lenski announced something momentous: For the first time in recorded scientific history, researchers have been able to observe evolutionary change in progress, confirming and refining Darwin's epochal 1859 theory on the genetic level.


Flasks of evolved E. coli


One would think that this coffin nail would have silenced the Creationist crowd forever. It didn't. If anything, it momentarily energized them. )

Addendum, July 24, 2008: Just for fun, I headed over to Conservapedia and looked up the latest bashing entry for "evolution." I found this sentence:

The theory of evolution posits a process of self-transformation from simple life forms to more complex life forms, which has never been observed or duplicated in a laboratory.


Weird. With such recent communications with the researcher who just observed and duplicated evolution in the lab, one would assume Schlafly would have rushed to his site to make corrections. . . wouldn't one?


*Addendum, April 5, 2009: Forgive me, readers, for I have omitted. When I first started The Deist Miasma, I fully expected to answer that last question, Why the creationists felt so threatened by the scientific explanations of life. After all, the "Fundamentally" in this post's title refers to the fundamental, underpinning assumptions Behe, Schlafly and Walker all hold that forces their science attacking actions. I wrapped up the third and last installment, though, and forgot to answer that question. Why? I am a lazy, forgetful idiot. Let me rectify that omission now, with a supplement to the original entry that runs from the asterisk to the LJ cut.
peristaltor: (Default)
Something I've mentioned before has, it seems, been further clarified by Mother Jones:

The emperor's-new-clothes flimsiness of these widely accepted exaggerated numbers says much about the cold calculation of far-right religious leaders. Moral Majority and Focus on the Family have happily staked their clout on coreligionists who never knew they were being counted—often twice or three times—among the faithful for political ends. "The idea that evangelicals are taking over America is one of the greatest publicity scams in history," Wicker concludes, "a perfect coup accomplished by savvy politicos and religious leaders, who understand media weaknesses and exploit them brilliantly."

. . . Part of the problem is that the national-level journalists who control the discourse tend not to be, nor have they ever been, committed religionists as adults. Newsrooms are determinedly secular, and self-consciously so. Afraid of being tagged as godless liberals, most journalists would never dream of calling BS on believers. (Emphasis mine)


Yes, folks, there aren't nearly as many in the God Squad as they would like you to believe. Let's see that graph I posted once again:



Ah. Pretty.

Addendum, June 4, 2008: Looks like this info is going mainstream!

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] richie73.
peristaltor: (Default)
. . . Bibleman!



See Willie Aames from Eight is Enough swing his glowing saber and scripture, fighting evil, bald doubts, alongside his camo-wearing Man Friday!


[livejournal.com profile] beachofdreams earns major props for this one!
peristaltor: (Default)

NSFW, if they give you speakers at your computer
peristaltor: (Default)
This guy starts by "defending" Scientologists, then quickly and wittily says why:

I wish religion was, like anal beads and Everybody Loves Raymond, something that people practiced privately, in their homes, and it was an individual matter that rarely intruded on my life. Because theoretically, I really don't care what you believe in. I don't give two shits if you worship Jesus or Allah or Brett Favre or The Force or little fucking forest gnomes. In theory, it makes no difference to me whether your idea of a religious experience is saying ten Hail Marys, or nailing your balls to a wooden plank while defacating. It should be no concern of mine. But these fucking fundamentalist Christians have unfortunately made it my business and everyone's business, and because of their insistence on meddling with science and politics, I now have to try and figure out who's the least superstitious Presidential candidate. I wish it would never even occur to me that the prospective leader of the free world might, in the 21st century, reject a basic foundation of science. But alas, this is the dumb, credulous kindergarten class known as America, where, much to the snickering bemusement of Europe and the rest of the developed world, our political leaders have to show up on TV kneeling in front of a cross at Sunday mass to even be considered a candidate for Commander in Chief. And that, sadly, makes religion an important issue - because religion has begun threatening science, and if we start tearing away at science, we risk losing what little sense of reason and logic our country still has left to hold onto.


Oh, so well put, sir.

Profile

peristaltor: (Default)
peristaltor

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 04:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios